Books

Crimson Bound: A Dark Fantasy Romance for Young Adults

Book Review (with spoilers):

Crimson Bound by Rosamund Hodge

Rating: 6 out of 10 stars

Overview

Pros

  • Decent representation of a character with a disability
  • Moderately successful at worldbuilding
  • Dark, complex heroine
  • Lots of twists
  • Pretty good writing

Cons

  • Used fairy tale references that created certain expectations and then failed to deliver
  • Weird love triangle between polar opposites, one of which is completely unsavory

Warning! Minor spoilers ahead!*

*Does not spoil the ending and the major twists.

Review

Let me start out by saying that there is no reason to call this a retelling of Little Red Riding Hood. It just isn’t. Rachelle, the main character, wears a red hood, but that is where the similarities stop. There is no big bad wolf, no helpless grandmother. It’s just Rachelle and her bad decisions. This is as much a retelling of Little Red Riding Hood as the anime RWBY is.

This is also supposed to be loosely based on The Girl Without Hands, a lesser-known tale collected by the Brothers Grimm. I do see the connection here, because there is a man/love interest whose hands were chopped off and who wears silver hands.

Rachelle is in training to become a woodwife. The woodwife’s purpose is “to weave the charms that protect the village” and “remember the ancient lore.”

Only she’s still young and is prone to bad decision-making. A forestborn, which worships the evil Devourer (a dangerous god) coaxes her from the path and marks her with a curse. She has a short time allotted to kill someone before she will die. She kills her beloved aunt in her second bad decision of the novel. Or at least a morally bad decision, if not perhaps logically bad, but it is one that haunts her.

She becomes something that is not quite human, a cursed creature, a bloodbound. Wanting to serve her kingdom, she enlists as one of the king’s hunters, saving the people from monsters such as wood spawn.

Her aunt told her once that in life, you could take “the path of needles or the path of pins.” This advice was inspired by the actions one could take if a dress tore. You could either pin it up, a temporary but quick fix, or take the time to sew it together. I love this adage and I believe it becomes Rachelle’s life philosophy. She’s not looking for the easy way out. She wants to prevent the Devourer’s return and kill it if possible, and will go to any means necessary to find the sword capable of doing so.

The adage appears to have been taken from a variation of the Little Red Riding Hood story. In it, the girl is asked by the wolf if she will take the path of needles or the path of pins, and the girl chooses the path of needles, like Rachelle always does.

Rachelle wanted to sew the world back to safety, if she must use her own bones for needles.”

Rachelle is ordered by the king to guard his bastard son, Armand, whom the people of the kingdom believe is a saint. He claims to have been cursed like Rachelle and refused to kill to survive, which led to the loss of his hands. Rachelle frankly hates his guts. If he is lying, than he is creating an unreasonable expectation for bloodbound like Rachelle not to do what they had to survive. If he is telling the truth, than Rachelle did not have to kill her beloved aunt.

The story ends up giving us an odd love triangle between one of the king’s other bloodbound hunters–Erec, Armand, and Rachelle. Armand and Rachelle are great enemies-to-lovers.

It is worth noting that Armand does not fit the stereotypical YA romance dude mold. He has stumps for hands and is rather plain looking. Some diversity for once is nice. It is also worth mentioning that Armand’s lack of hands is not something Rachelle finds unattractive or that she must get used to. I feel like there was so many ways like that, that the story could have been written wrong and cringey, and Hodge didn’t make any of those poor writing decisions. Initial shock at seeing Armand without the silver hands is all that Rachelle ever feels about them, and it moves on. It’s just not an issue, thank god. Some disability rep without making it a sob story, pity party, or ableist crap.

Erec is a piece of work. He’s brash, arrogant, obnoxious. Just ugh! Not a good dude for Rachelle to like, but hey, whatever. I don’t know why there even needed to be a triangle here. I think love triangles can be done well, but this one was not.

To be fair, romance is not my typical genre of choice, so you might enjoy the drama the love triangle offered in this book, but I found that it was more like a third-wheel-kind-of-situation.

My other complaint for this book is that it was confusing at times, especially with the mythology behind Zisa and Tyr. I noticed that several people also complained that Hodge used a lot of names from fairy tales and myths, which created certain reasonable expectations, and then flaunted them. It did not do the source material justice. Plus, as I said before, it cannot really be called a retelling of the Little Red Riding Hood fairy tale.

In conclusion, I would recommend this book mainly to those who appreciate YA romance and either don’t mind or enjoy the enemies-to-lovers and love triangle tropes. If you want a light-hearted fantasy, look elsewhere. This one is pretty dark.

If you like my content, subscribe to my newsletter!

Shows

This Fairy Tale Retelling Shouldn’t Be Rated PG

Once Upon a Time Season 1.jpg

Spoiler-Free Show Review:

Once Upon A Time Season 1

Rating: 9.8 out of 10 stars

Intro

I watched Once Upon A Time for the first time with my siblings, and it was so good I was happy to watch it a second time with my roommate and suitemate. Most fairy tale retellings don’t impress me, but Once Upon A Time, especially Season 1, was able to tell the stories in a way that celebrated the old and emphasized the new.

After watching several episodes, I was shocked that anyone would rate this show PG. It is not appropriate for children–read on to find out why.

Background

Season 1 of Once Upon A Time first aired in 2011 and concluded in 2012. It was created by Adam Horowitz and Edward Kitsis, and is an ABC television series now offered on Disney Plus.

Season 1 stars Ginnifer Goodwin, Jennifer Morrison, Lana Parilla, Josh Dallas, Jared S. Gilmore, Raphael Sbarge, Jamie Dornan, Robert Carlyle, and Eion Bailey.

Summary

On her 28th birthday, Emma Swan is unexpectedly reunited with the 10-year-old son she had given up for adoption. After driving him back to his adoptive mother in Storybrooke, Maine, Emma’s concern for him makes her hesitant to leave.

Her son, Henry Mills, believes that the stories in his book of fairy tales are real. He thinks that the people of Storybrooke are fairy tale characters trapped by a curse and have lost their memories of their past lives.

Henry tells Emma that she is their only hope for breaking the curse, but Emma does not believe him.

Season 1 tells the stories of various characters, alternating between their pasts in a fairy tale world and their current lives in Storybrooke. It also follows the struggles of Emma and Henry against Regina, Henry’s manipulative adoptive mother.

Pros

  • Clever foreshadowing
  • Consistent, well-crafted structure
  • Great acting
  • Subverting viewer expectations
  • Clever ways of connecting various fairy tales
  • Likeable, realistic characters
  • Impressive character development
  • In-depth backstories
  • Character names in Storybrooke chosen for meaning
  • Costume design reflects character personality

Cons

  • Occasionally overdramatic
  • The graphics in Wonderland were shoddy

Review

Foreshadowing

The title sequences always has a different shadowy sneak peak of what the episode is going to be about. Look for dark woods in the title screen to see the foreshadowing.

Structure

The structure of each episode includes flashbacks to a character’s past in the fairy tale world as well as glimpses of the character’s present-day life in Storybrooke.

The story that has happened in the past is usually linked strongly to what is happening in the present in any given episode.

Viewer Expectations

Viewers have certain expectations based on their knowledge of the fairy tales. However, the creators of Once Upon A Time use this to their advantage by making stories seem familiar before repeatedly subverting viewer expectations.

These are not the bedtime stories kids everywhere grew up with. These are new, refurbished, refined and stunning.

The way that fairy tales intertwine is particularly clever, especially the way the Beauty and the Beast tale works.

Characters

Red Riding Hood | Once Upon a Time Wiki | Fandom

Almost every single character has an in-depth back story, and many begin in Season 1. The story of Snow White and Prince Charming take center stage, but my personal favorite is the story of Red Riding Hood.

The characters develop both in the past and in the present. The most development is seen in Emma Swan, Mary Margaret Blanchard, and David Nolan.

The characters act realistically considering their personalities, and even though it is dramatic, the reactions of the characters are often reasonable considering their circumstances.

Once Upon a Time Favorite Character Moments: Snow White/Mary Margaret  Blanchard | The Girly Nerd

Character names in present-day Maine were chosen carefully for their meaning. For example, the name Mary Margaret Blanchard was chosen for Snow White because Blanchard is a French name meaning “white” and Mary and Margaret were names Snow used in her fairy tale past to conceal her identity.

Costume Design

7 Easy Halloween Costumes from Once Upon a Time | Once Upon A Time

The costume design fits the characters’ personalities perfectly. For example, Regina’s hair styles and costumes particularly reflect her flamboyant style and dark personality.

Drama

The drama is reasonable and understandable most of the time, but sometimes it is over-the-top. For example, when something terrible happens, the camera will often switch rapidly from shocked expression to expression in a way that seems overly contrived. People can be shocked, but not every character needs a close-up.

Conclusion

Overall, I really enjoyed Season 1 of Once Upon A Time. I would recommend this series for teens and adults.

Despite its PG rating, I would not recommend Once Upon A Time for children due to violence, suggestive content, and dark themes. Seriously. Hearts get ripped out and crushed, there is an affair, people get turned into animals and stepped on, a person is mauled and eaten, etc.

Rating System

If you are interested in how I rate shows, check out my rating system.

If you like my content, subscribe to my newsletter!