Spoiler-Free Show Review:
Sherlock Season 4
Rating: 7 out of 10 stars
Having enjoyed the first three seasons of Sherlock, I expected the last season to impress, but I ended up being disappointed. It was actually still somewhat enjoyable, but nowhere as phenomenal as the earlier seasons.
Warning! Even though there are no spoilers for Season 4 in this article, there are minor spoilers from previous seasons.
Sherlock Season 4 aired in 2017 and was produced by BBC and Hartswood films. It is based off of Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes books, but instead of being placed in Victorian England, the show is set in modern-day London.
The show stars Benedict Cumberbatch, Martin Freeman, Rupert Graves, Una Stubbs, Mark Gatiss, Louise Brealey, Andrew Scott, and Amanda Abbington.
In addition to being nominated for various awards, Sherlock won in three categories in the Primetime Emmy Awards.
- Phenomenal acting
- Immersive setting highly relevant to a modern-day audience
- Benefit of the familiar character of Sherlock with a new spin
- Strong character development
- A fascinating villain at the end of the season
- Intelligent, occasionally comical, script
- Catchy theme song and music
- A lackluster first villain of the season
- Sherlock’s ability to predict the future stretches believability
- Unnecessarily confusing, especially in the last episode
- Yet more predictable in the first episode
- You could probably stop watching at Season 3 if you wanted a better ending for the series
The acting, especially by Benedict Cumberbatch, Martin Freeman, was incredible. They each played their parts well.
All of the fantastic and obnoxious qualities of Sherlock were brought out and emphasized. The way that the actors for Sherlock, Watson and Mary interact shows great chemistry and skill.
The setting in Season 4 is the same as Seasons 1-3, unsurprisingly: modern-day London. The presence of modern conveniences such as security cameras and phones remains a way for this new Sherlock to test his intellect. John Watson records their adventures through a blog, another modern touch. This transition from the Victorian London of the books to modern-day London is seamless.
Sherlock is a highly intelligent man who lacks empathy. He is nevertheless shown on several occasions to have at least some degree of care depending on who the person is. He is always blunt, but occasionally shows remorse for his words when they have caused damage.
Watson is of higher-than-average intelligence, but he cannot compete with Sherlock. Watson, however, has a deep sense of empathy and values human life while wanting to negate human suffering. He has a high tolerance for Sherlock, but even he loses his temper sometimes at Sherlock’s careless comments ill-timed deductions, and drug habit.
This season introduces more tension between Watson and Sherlock when Sherlock makes a critical error.
The first villain is creepy at least, but he lacks the style and creativeness of villains such as Moriarty. The second villain is fascinating and more intelligent than Sherlock and Mycroft. She once cut open her skin because she wanted to see how her muscles worked. Unfortunately, I cannot provide a picture of either of them without spoiling the series.
The script of Season 4 is actually pretty good. There are several quotable moments. For example, an unexpected reflection on suicide by Sherlock.
“Taking your own life. Interesting expression– taking it from who? Once it’s over, it’s not you who’ll miss it. Your own death is something that happens to everybody else. Your life is not your own. Keep your hands off it.”
There is also a decent amount of humor in the fourth season.
Watson: “I need a second opinion.”
Sherlock: “Oh, please, John. Since when have you ever managed TWO opinions. You’d fall over.”
There is even some genuine sincerity on the part of Sherlock:
Mycroft: “Dr. Watson? Could you please leave?”
Sherlock: “John stays.”
Mycroft: “This is about family.”
Sherlock: “THAT’S why he stays!”
The theme music is catchy as always, and the music throughout the episodes is fitting and develops the mood.
Sherlock’s skills were always unbelievably amazing, but now he adds telling the future to his repertoire of skills. He predicts the exact location and time of events without a strong explanation as to how he managed to do so. Making Sherlock near-omniscient was not a good choice.
The level of predictability for the first episode is higher than the rest of the episodes. Sherlock’s mistake is unsurprising, as well as the results.
All the confusion in the series stems from one villain. Somehow the creators made her whole storyline extremely convoluted. I found myself wondering, what the heck just happened? The villain was impressive, but the events surrounding her created too much confusion.
Even though I found this season somewhat enjoyable, I think that you may be better off stopping at Season 3. That’s what my siblings ended up doing and I don’t blame them.
I recommend this season for audiences ages 13+.
If you are interested in how I rate shows, check out my rating system.